<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Amazon is missing an opportunity with the Kindle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flyovermarketing.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/why-amazon-is-missing-an-opportunity-with-the-kindle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flyovermarketing.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/why-amazon-is-missing-an-opportunity-with-the-kindle/</link>
	<description>With the new marketing tools, "fly-over country" can work just as well as the coasts.  We're all connected now.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pidgeon92</title>
		<link>http://flyovermarketing.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/why-amazon-is-missing-an-opportunity-with-the-kindle/#comment-10261</link>
		<dc:creator>pidgeon92</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 17:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flyovermarketing.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/why-amazon-is-missing-an-opportunity-with-the-kindle/#comment-10261</guid>
		<description>What makes you think they aren&#039;t trying? People like to harp on Amazon and give them lots of free advice. Amazon, however, does NOT OWN THE CONTENT. Publishers own the content. I can only imagine the amount of negotiating it would take to get the publishers together on a rental scheme.   It could very well happen, but I imagine that Amazon is going to have to prove this is a viable platform first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes you think they aren&#8217;t trying? People like to harp on Amazon and give them lots of free advice. Amazon, however, does NOT OWN THE CONTENT. Publishers own the content. I can only imagine the amount of negotiating it would take to get the publishers together on a rental scheme.   It could very well happen, but I imagine that Amazon is going to have to prove this is a viable platform first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
